Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
vala
vala
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 701
    • Issues 701
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 38
    • Merge Requests 38
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • External Wiki
    • External Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • GNOME
  • valavala
  • Issues
  • #426

Closed
Open
Opened Jan 13, 2014 by bugzilla-migration@bugzilla-migrationReporter

Use of GLib.return_if_fail in construct {} produces invalid code

Submitted by Stef Walter

Link to original bug (#722090)

Description

The construct { } syntax in vala does not have a return value. However when using GLib.return_if_fail within a construct { } section, the resulting code is placed in an xxx_constructor() function which does have a return value.

Therefore you get a "Non-void function should return a value" problem.

Will attach a test case.

Blocking

  • Bug 722023
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: GNOME/vala#426