Skip to content
  • Milan Crha's avatar
    Bug #727237 - Correct LGPL license information in sources · 36846c1f
    Milan Crha authored
    I also added license information to source files where it was
    missing and changed the way the license block is organized. All
    the sources' license information comments follow the same pattern:
    
    /* [ Optional short file description ]
     *
     * [ Optional copyright notices]
     *
     * License information block
     *
     * [ Optional 'Authors:' section ]
     */
    
    The LGPL is references consistently now; source files with main()
    function, like tests or D-Bus services, use 'program' in the license
    information block, while the other sources use 'library' word.
    36846c1f