Commit c6f15f38 authored by Manish Singh's avatar Manish Singh Committed by Manish Singh

Applied patch from Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>. Vertically

Sun Sep 30 22:15:52 2001  Manish Singh  <yosh@gimp.org>

        * gtk/gtkcheckbutton.c (gtk_check_button_size_allocate): Applied
        patch from Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>. Vertically
        centers the child in relation to the to indicator height.
parent 916b1610
Sun Sep 30 22:15:52 2001 Manish Singh <yosh@gimp.org>
* gtk/gtkcheckbutton.c (gtk_check_button_size_allocate): Applied
patch from Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>. Vertically
centers the child in relation to the to indicator height.
Sun Sep 30 15:11:59 2001 Jonathan Blandford <jrb@redhat.com>
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST correct
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST
correct
Sun Sep 30 07:01:42 2001 CEST <mikeh@bahnhof.se>
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c I reverted back to old "weight" property code using g_param_spec_int
and changed from g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead.
Probadly a better way to fix the problem :-)
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c: I reverted back to old "weight"
property code using g_param_spec_int and changed from
g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead. Probably a better way
to fix the problem :-)
Sun Sep 30 05:31:32 2001 CEST Mikael Hermansson <tyan@linux.se>
......
Sun Sep 30 22:15:52 2001 Manish Singh <yosh@gimp.org>
* gtk/gtkcheckbutton.c (gtk_check_button_size_allocate): Applied
patch from Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>. Vertically
centers the child in relation to the to indicator height.
Sun Sep 30 15:11:59 2001 Jonathan Blandford <jrb@redhat.com>
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST correct
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST
correct
Sun Sep 30 07:01:42 2001 CEST <mikeh@bahnhof.se>
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c I reverted back to old "weight" property code using g_param_spec_int
and changed from g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead.
Probadly a better way to fix the problem :-)
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c: I reverted back to old "weight"
property code using g_param_spec_int and changed from
g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead. Probably a better way
to fix the problem :-)
Sun Sep 30 05:31:32 2001 CEST Mikael Hermansson <tyan@linux.se>
......
Sun Sep 30 22:15:52 2001 Manish Singh <yosh@gimp.org>
* gtk/gtkcheckbutton.c (gtk_check_button_size_allocate): Applied
patch from Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>. Vertically
centers the child in relation to the to indicator height.
Sun Sep 30 15:11:59 2001 Jonathan Blandford <jrb@redhat.com>
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST correct
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST
correct
Sun Sep 30 07:01:42 2001 CEST <mikeh@bahnhof.se>
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c I reverted back to old "weight" property code using g_param_spec_int
and changed from g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead.
Probadly a better way to fix the problem :-)
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c: I reverted back to old "weight"
property code using g_param_spec_int and changed from
g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead. Probably a better way
to fix the problem :-)
Sun Sep 30 05:31:32 2001 CEST Mikael Hermansson <tyan@linux.se>
......
Sun Sep 30 22:15:52 2001 Manish Singh <yosh@gimp.org>
* gtk/gtkcheckbutton.c (gtk_check_button_size_allocate): Applied
patch from Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>. Vertically
centers the child in relation to the to indicator height.
Sun Sep 30 15:11:59 2001 Jonathan Blandford <jrb@redhat.com>
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST correct
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST
correct
Sun Sep 30 07:01:42 2001 CEST <mikeh@bahnhof.se>
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c I reverted back to old "weight" property code using g_param_spec_int
and changed from g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead.
Probadly a better way to fix the problem :-)
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c: I reverted back to old "weight"
property code using g_param_spec_int and changed from
g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead. Probably a better way
to fix the problem :-)
Sun Sep 30 05:31:32 2001 CEST Mikael Hermansson <tyan@linux.se>
......
Sun Sep 30 22:15:52 2001 Manish Singh <yosh@gimp.org>
* gtk/gtkcheckbutton.c (gtk_check_button_size_allocate): Applied
patch from Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>. Vertically
centers the child in relation to the to indicator height.
Sun Sep 30 15:11:59 2001 Jonathan Blandford <jrb@redhat.com>
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST correct
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST
correct
Sun Sep 30 07:01:42 2001 CEST <mikeh@bahnhof.se>
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c I reverted back to old "weight" property code using g_param_spec_int
and changed from g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead.
Probadly a better way to fix the problem :-)
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c: I reverted back to old "weight"
property code using g_param_spec_int and changed from
g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead. Probably a better way
to fix the problem :-)
Sun Sep 30 05:31:32 2001 CEST Mikael Hermansson <tyan@linux.se>
......
Sun Sep 30 22:15:52 2001 Manish Singh <yosh@gimp.org>
* gtk/gtkcheckbutton.c (gtk_check_button_size_allocate): Applied
patch from Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>. Vertically
centers the child in relation to the to indicator height.
Sun Sep 30 15:11:59 2001 Jonathan Blandford <jrb@redhat.com>
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST correct
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST
correct
Sun Sep 30 07:01:42 2001 CEST <mikeh@bahnhof.se>
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c I reverted back to old "weight" property code using g_param_spec_int
and changed from g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead.
Probadly a better way to fix the problem :-)
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c: I reverted back to old "weight"
property code using g_param_spec_int and changed from
g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead. Probably a better way
to fix the problem :-)
Sun Sep 30 05:31:32 2001 CEST Mikael Hermansson <tyan@linux.se>
......
Sun Sep 30 22:15:52 2001 Manish Singh <yosh@gimp.org>
* gtk/gtkcheckbutton.c (gtk_check_button_size_allocate): Applied
patch from Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>. Vertically
centers the child in relation to the to indicator height.
Sun Sep 30 15:11:59 2001 Jonathan Blandford <jrb@redhat.com>
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST correct
* gtk/gtktreestore.c (gtk_tree_store_remove): Make ITERS_PERSIST
correct
Sun Sep 30 07:01:42 2001 CEST <mikeh@bahnhof.se>
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c I reverted back to old "weight" property code using g_param_spec_int
and changed from g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead.
Probadly a better way to fix the problem :-)
* gtk/gtkcellrenderertext.c: I reverted back to old "weight"
property code using g_param_spec_int and changed from
g_value_get_enum to g_value_get_int instead. Probably a better way
to fix the problem :-)
Sun Sep 30 05:31:32 2001 CEST Mikael Hermansson <tyan@linux.se>
......
......@@ -283,14 +283,16 @@ gtk_check_button_size_allocate (GtkWidget *widget,
{
gint border_width = GTK_CONTAINER (widget)->border_width;
child_allocation.x = (border_width + indicator_size + indicator_spacing * 3 + 1 +
widget->allocation.x);
child_allocation.y = border_width + 1 + widget->allocation.y;
child_allocation.width = MIN (GTK_BIN (button)->child->requisition.width,
allocation->width -
((border_width + 1) * 2 + indicator_size + indicator_spacing * 3));
child_allocation.height = MIN (GTK_BIN (button)->child->requisition.height,
allocation->height - (border_width + 1) * 2);
child_allocation.x = (border_width + indicator_size + indicator_spacing * 3 + 1 +
widget->allocation.x);
child_allocation.y = widget->allocation.y +
(allocation->height - child_allocation.height) / 2;
if (gtk_widget_get_direction (widget) == GTK_TEXT_DIR_RTL)
child_allocation.x = allocation->x + allocation->width
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment