Commit 6e9fd683 authored by Matthias Clasen's avatar Matthias Clasen

inspector: Do a better job with readonly properties

Say if they are non-writable or construct-only, and also
gray out construct-only properties in the list.
parent a28e76f0
......@@ -1712,6 +1712,20 @@ constructed (GObject *object)
can_modify = ((spec->flags & G_PARAM_WRITABLE) != 0 &&
(spec->flags & G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY) == 0);
if ((spec->flags & G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY) != 0)
label = gtk_label_new ("(construct-only)");
else if ((spec->flags & G_PARAM_WRITABLE) == 0)
label = gtk_label_new ("(not writable)");
else
label = NULL;
if (label)
{
gtk_widget_show (label);
gtk_style_context_add_class (gtk_widget_get_style_context (label), GTK_STYLE_CLASS_DIM_LABEL);
gtk_container_add (GTK_CONTAINER (editor), label);
}
/* By reaching this, we already know the property is readable.
* Since all we can do for a GObject is dive down into it's properties
* and inspect bindings and such, pretend to be mutable.
......
......@@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ gtk_inspector_prop_list_update_prop (GtkInspectorPropList *pl,
gchar *value;
gchar *type;
gchar *attribute = NULL;
gboolean writable;
g_value_init (&gvalue, prop->value_type);
if (pl->priv->child_properties)
......@@ -447,13 +448,16 @@ gtk_inspector_prop_list_update_prop (GtkInspectorPropList *pl,
attribute = g_strdup_printf ("%d", column);
}
writable = ((prop->flags & G_PARAM_WRITABLE) != 0) &&
((prop->flags & G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY) == 0);
gtk_list_store_set (pl->priv->model, iter,
COLUMN_NAME, prop->name,
COLUMN_VALUE, value ? value : "",
COLUMN_TYPE, type ? type : "",
COLUMN_DEFINED_AT, g_type_name (prop->owner_type),
COLUMN_TOOLTIP, g_param_spec_get_blurb (prop),
COLUMN_WRITABLE, (prop->flags & G_PARAM_WRITABLE) != 0,
COLUMN_WRITABLE, writable,
COLUMN_ATTRIBUTE, attribute ? attribute : "",
-1);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment