For now, we return FALSE for all default css values, so this is not very
useful.

I also think of this as an optimization equal, not a guaranteed equal,
because we don't even have a notion of what "equal" means.

For example, for background-repeat, "repeat, repeat" and "repeat"
are functionally equivalent. But the cssvalue has no idea that it's used
for background-repeat.
As a more complicated example, "repeat, no-repeat" and "repeat" are
equal to what one sees as long as there's only one image listed
background-image-source. But once you start transition'ing to an image
with 2 sources, it's different...