-
Jehan authored
The get() API are sometimes nicer in C code because it's just simpler to loop through C arrays, but they end up with similar API to the list() variants for binding, or with a useless size return value (since most higher level languages have length-aware array types, which is what GList are transformed into). So let's use the list() variants as the main ones and skip the get() variants. I hesitated to rename the list() variants to get() with `(rename-to)` annotations but since I am unsure if the get() bindings are absolutely useless, I don't think it's the best idea. Maybe on some other language usable as GI binding, the get() variant might be different again and nicer to use. So if we shadowed these by renaming list() ones, the day we change our mind, we'd have to rename get() ones too (which would be very confusing), or else break bindings' API. To avoid this, I just skip the get() ones altogether in bindings but leave their name available ...
15ec2541